Guam Resists Military Colonization
― Having No Say When Washington Tries to
Increase your Population by 25% ―
by Ann Wright
The United States and the Chinese governments have some remarkable
similarities when it comes to colonization. The Chinese government has
sent a huge Han population to inhabit Tibet and overwhelm the Tibetan
population, even building the world's highest railway to get people and
materials there.
The United States government, with virtually no consultation with
the local government and citizens, is increasing the population of its
non-voting territory, Guam, by 25%. 8,000 U.S. Marines, their dependents
and associated logistics units and personnel-a total of 42,000 new
residents-will be moved to the small Pacific island (barely three times
the size of Washington, DC) that has a current population of 175,000.
The move will have a tremendous impact on the cultural and social
identity of the island.
These military forces are being relocated to Guam, in great measure,
because of the "Close US Military Bases" campaign organized
by citizen
activists in Okinawa, Japan. The United States has had a huge military
presence there since the end of World War II.
I thought I was reasonably well-informed about America's interests in
the Pacific. I had worked as a US diplomat in Micronesia for two years
and travelled many times through Guam, a US territory, located an 8 hour
flight west of Honolulu.
But earlier this month, in Guam on a study tour sponsored by a coalition
of Japanese peace activists spearheaded by CODEPINK-Osaka, Japan,
which included a former member of the Japanese Diet (Parliament),
I learned new aspects of the decision to relocate this large number of
U.S.military to Guam.
Guam was first colonized by the Spanish in the 1500s, became a US
colony in 1898, a war-trophy from the Spanish-American war and served
as a stopover for ships travelling to the Philippines. During World War
II,
Guam was attacked and occupied by Japan on December 8, 1941,
the day after the Japanese attacked Pearl Harbor. American citizens
living on the island had been evacuated by the United States government
before the attack, but the indigenous Chamorro population was left behind.
During the 31 months of Japanese occupation, the Chamorros endured
forced labor, concentration camps, forced prostitution, rape and execution
by the Japanese military. The United States military returned three and
one-half years later on July 21, 1944 to retake Guam.
In 1950, Guam was made an "unincorporated territory" of the
United
States by a US Congressional act and residents were given UN as one
of 16 "non-self governing territories" left in the world.
Lands were taken after World War II from the native Chamorro population
without compensation by the US military to construct major air and naval
bases which the US military still uses. Currently, there are 3,000 US
Air Force and 2,000 US Navy personnel and 1,000 employees of other
federal security agencies assigned to Guam.
Three Guam legislators told us that the Guam government has not been
properly consulted in the discussions between the US and Japanese
governments on the relocation of the large US Marine force. Guam officials
have been given little firm information about the military expansion
plans.
They are very concerned about the impact of further militarization of
their
island as its major income is provided by hundreds of thousands of Japanese
tourists who visit the tropical island annually.
They are disturbed by rumors of proposed forced condemnation of another
950 acres of land owned by members of the native Chamorro population
for a live fire range for the incoming Marines. Residues of Agent Orange
left
from the Vietnam War and other toxic wastes from the military bases,
plus
the possibility that artillery shells and other munitions made from depleted
uranium will be used on their island, are all sources of concern for
the
people of Guam.
In order to get the 8,000 US Marines out of Okinawa, the Japanese
government is paying $6 billion to the US government for their relocation.
Guam officials are concerned that not enough of the relocation funds will
be made available for the large infrastructure improvements that will
be
needed for the island's roads, water, sewage and electrical systems as
it
tries to support a 25% increase in population. They feel the military
will take
care of its bases but may leave the local population struggling with the
new infrastructure problems created by the large number of military
personnel.
The Japanese people, too, are in the dark about the details of the billions
of dollars they will pay the US government to have US forces leave Japan.
Japanese members of our delegation were shocked when they learned from
local Guam activists that the relocation budget calls for the Japanese
government to pay $650,000 for the construction of each new house on
the base, while Guam activists told us the cost of a middle class home
on
Guam is around $250,000. The Japanese delegation was greatly concerned
that their government is funding such inflated projects and is going
to
raise the budget with Japanese Diet members when they return to Japan.
Of concern to the Guam business community is consideration by US House
of Representatives law makers to give Japanese contractors the same
access as American firms to bidding on contracts worth more than $2.5
billion in upcoming US military construction projects on Guam. Apparently,
the Japanese government, like the US government, likes to have its
commercial firms benefit from government aid projects it is funding "overseas."
With Japan's $6 billion contribution to the $10 billion cost of relocating
the
Marines, Japan wants some of that money returned to Japan through
construction contracts on the Guam infrastructure projects.
Many Guam officials and a large number of Guam citizens are deeply
concerned about the cultural, economic and security impact of the dramatic
increase in population and militarization of their island the relocation
would
present. The current cultural divide of those living in relative luxury
inside
the bases with better housing, schools and services has been a source
of
friction between the US military and the local population over the years.
Guam officials said that they too have been perturbed about the extra-
ordinarily high expenditures on US military base facilities, when the
Government of Guam is strapped financially. The officials said they were
amazed and horrified when they learned that the Air Force recently built
an on-base animal kennel for $27 million, with each animal space costing
$100,000, when locally, the government is unable to provide sufficient
infrastructure for its citizens, much less animals.
Professors and students at the University of Guam expressed concern
that there will be a sharp increase in sexual assault and rape on the
island
due to the relocation of US Marines. They believe one of the reasons the
Japanese government finally was able to get the US government to move
some military forces out of Okinawa was because of major citizen
mobilizations that occurred in response to rapes by US military personnel.
In 2008, the US Ambassador to Japan had to fly to Okinawa to give his
apologies for the rape of a 14 year old girl by a US Marine. The US military
forces on Okinawa had a 3 day stand-down for "reflection" and
Secretary
of State Condoleezza Rice had to express her "regrets" to the
Japanese
Prime Minister "for the terrible incident that happened in Okinawa...
we are concerned for the well-being of the young girl and her family."
In April, 2008, U.S. Marine Staff Sergeant Tyrone Hadnott, 38, who had
been
in the Marines 18 years, was charged with the February 10, 2008, rape
of
14 year old girl, abusive sexual contact with a child, making a false
official
statement, adultery and kidnapping.
On May 17, 2008, Hadnott was found guilty of abusive sexual conduct and
the four other charges were dropped. Hadnott was sentenced to four years
in prison, but will only serve a maximum of three years in prison due
to a
pretrial agreement that suspended the fourth year of the sentence. He
was
reduced to private and given a dishonorable discharge from the US Marines.
The rape accusation against Hadnott stirred memories of a brutal rape more
than a decade ago and triggered outrage across Japan. Japanese Prime
Minister Yasuo Fukuda said that Hadnott's actions were "unforgivable."
There are US Congressional stirrings of concern about the relocation of
the Marines to Guam. House of Representatives Armed Services Committee
chair Ike Skelton has raised concerns about the size, scope and cost
of
the move to Guam. "At over $10 billion (two and one-half times the
initial
cost estimate of $4 billion), it is an enormous project, and I am concerned
that the thinking behind it is not yet sufficiently mature," Skelton
said at a
recent Congressional hearing. "We need to do this, but it needs to
be done
right."
In a challenge to US military "forward deployment" strategy
in Asia and
the Pacific, Guam activists strongly feel the US military should relocate
large forces to the mainland of the US where there presence can be better
absorbed by the greater populations and existing large military bases, rather
than to their small Pacific island.
However, the US federal government seldom takes into account local
feelings about their projects, particularly military projects in a region
far
removed from the Washington power center.
Guam activists want their voices heard and respected and not to be treated
as merely residents of a colony of the United States.
.....................................................................................................................................
・http://www.voicesofconscience.com/ Voices of Conscience
・GAZA FEEEDOM
MARCH!
http://www.gazafreedommarch.org/article.php?list=type&type=416
・http://codepink.jp/ Code Pink Osaka
・ http://www.codepink4peace.org/ Code Pink
- about Ann Wright -
During the run-up to war in Iraq, Army Colonel (Ret.) and diplomat Ann
Wright resigned her State Department post. She was one among dozens
of government insiders and active-duty military personnel who leaked
documents, spoke out, resigned, or refused to deploy in protest of
government actions they felt were illegal. In Dissent: Voices of Conscience,
Ann Wright and Susan Dixon tell the stories of these men and women, who
risked careers, reputations, and even freedom out of loyalty to the
Constitution and the rule of law.
( http://www.voicesofconscience.com/)
................................................................................
thankful to Ann Wright, Hisae Ogata, Kyle Kajihiro and Sung-Hee, Choi.
|